Klaus

humankind's most toxic garbage

 Mon, 18 Sep 2017 08:51:41 +0200 
#^Nuclear waste: Where to store it for eternity? | DW Environment | DW | 12.09.2017
Image/photo

Nuclear power stations have been churning out radioactive waste for decades. At least 10 new reactors came online last year - making the question of long-term storage all the more pressing. There's no solution in sight.
elmussol
 Fri, 22 Sep 2017 11:33:53 +0200 
The ultimate example of humanity's hubris.
Jake Moomaw
 Sat, 23 Sep 2017 12:51:12 +0200 
As we see further and more voluminous expansion into space, there is the possibility that at least some of that material can find use.  NASA, for the first time since the early 70's, is starting to renew research on Nuclear Thermal Rockets, in which a radioactive source superheats either a propellant or the exhaust of a traditional chemical reaction, granting about double the efficiency of a typical hydrolox engine.  The spent carbon control rods can be compressed in the center of of a ball of non-radioactive carbon into a diamond which generates electricity, but does not emit any harmful rays.  Radiothermal generators do not necessarily need to use Plutonium anymore since we've been able to engineer a lot of our electronic components to require less power.

I'm not trying to downplay the horrible environmental impact that our collective amateurish handling of radioactive waste materials has had, but if we do see tens of thousands of people working in space within the next thirty years and the explosion in deep space probes that we are heading towards, turning some of that wasted into something useful will be a godsend.